Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Virginia DUI Richmond Lawyers Code 18.2-266

Virginia DUI Richmond Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Jefferson v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Richmond (Virginia) of driving under the influence and aggravated involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-36.1(B), respectively. He appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.3 provides that if an arrestee for driving under the influence refuses repeatedly to submit to blood or breath testing after being advised of the possible consequences of such refusal, no blood or breath samples shall be taken, and if charged with unreasonably refusing to submit to such testing, the arrestee may introduce evidence to try to establish that his refusal was reasonable.
  • The implied consent of one who operates a vehicle on the public highways of Virginia to take a blood test, in the event he be charged with drunk driving, is a measure flowing from the police power of the state designed to protect other users of state highways. It is not a qualified consent and it is not a conditional consent, and therefore there can be no qualified refusal or conditional refusal to take the test. The fact that under the Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.3 an accused is afforded an opportunity to establish the reasonableness of his refusal does not operate to dilute the consent previously given, or convert that consent into a qualified or conditional one. Section 18.2-268.3 does excuse from punishment for refusal to take the test one whose refusal is reasonable, such as where a person's health would be endangered by the withdrawal of blood.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Our Phone #

Richmond Virginia

Richmond 804-201-9009
Click here to call us toll free Sris Lawyer Click here to call us toll free

Social Icons

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts